Mommy, where’s ?MOTHERSCustodial mothers are given the ‘get our of jail FREE’ card for almost everything. Interfering with visitation,communications, legal rights and any other punishment that they want to inflict upon the Father (a.k.a. non-custodialspouse). When I reported the physical and sexual abuse and neglect of my son I was arrested even though I had proof. However when my X doesn’t show up for visitation, communications, etc. the judge just says, ‘if you don’t comply I can fineyou.’ If that was a Father standing up there he would get the maximum the judge could impose.Feminist organizations refute that Parental Alienation exists or that women are leading child kidnapping 9:1 over men. TheNation Organization of Women says that parental alienation is a Phony Disorder. But wait a new trend is also emerging ofwomen against women. What women abusing other women? Yes, step-mothers are also making headlines as thosewomen try to alienate children of their new boyfriends/husbands child(ren) (a.k.a. - her step children) from their biologicalmothers).Dr Phil ShowCustody CalculationsHaving to deal with another woman being around your boyfriend/husband causes tension in many relationships especiallywhen one or both cannot get along. Mothers permitting or men and/or step-fathers to punish children that are not your ownhas been reported to have higher abuse than biological parent punishment. So why are women more likely to kidnap the children. Here are some of the reasons that fathers have had such a bias anddiscrimination place against them?•Money•Revenge•Malice•Hatred•Attorneys work harder for a women because in most case the man is the only one who can pay the attorney feesand court costs, etc. The freeloading mothers get away with murder while the father is given the proverbial bloodletting.•False allegations are an easy win when a women turns on the tears. District attorneys rarely hesitate to take acase against an abusive Father but once they find out the allegations were false they leave the Father even morevictimized and are not willing to go after the mother. Courts and law enforcement are funded by our government topursue specific crimes. Besides attorneys advice women to make the allegations for an easy win. Place your betson the mothers because INJUSTICE is 99% in the mothers favor.BABIES FOR BANK‘Babies for bank’ is used for women who have created their own job of being a baby mill. Welfare, child support, and foodstamps are even more government programs which promote single mothers and when you throw in state laws whichprevent Fathers from having any rights to their biological children born our of wedlock pours salt on Children’s and Father’swounds. How many of these mothers have been in court because they were drinking and partying all hours of the day andnight while the children were home alone? Every 9 months or so I can increase my income without ever having to get ajob.HOSTAGE CHILDRENWomen are focused on one thing in a divorce and that is money. I want the house, I want the SUV, I want the kids(because I’ll get money). They don’t care about the kids but their lifestyle and being embarrassed in front of their girlfriendsif she shows up without getting at least half. But within weeks they have new boyfriends or a new husband who now isproviding additional income to her bank account.FALSE ALLEGATIONSFeminist also don’t want you to know the number of false abuse claims filed every year either. Just turn on the tear andturn up the acting and they are automatically a victim accusing a Father in our ‘guilty until proven guilty’ society. DistrictAttorneys who file false allegations against a Father just give the mother are given the ‘get our of jail FREE’ card andignore the injustice that they just served having no responsibility to ensure justice is served to the children or the Father.BRAIN WASHING‘Your Daddy doesn’t love you and is never coming back for you.’ ‘I told you he didn’t want you.’ Are all statementthat my X made while ‘why didn’t you show up’ and ‘what doctors appointment’ are statements that I’ve made. “Who toldyou to say you scare me?” “Mommy.” But a 4 year olds statements cannot be used as testimony. You must wait untilthe mother has had eight or more years to program a child before the child will even be considered a person with any rightsin the United States.Mommy told me to say you scare me.I know you’ve told me that mom is interfering, mom quit it, mom quit it, ...FATHER DOES NOT MEAN CHILD SUPPORT & ALIMONYFATHERSChild support is causing hostage children because Father does not mean child support or alimony. This concept haschanged women's view of marriage from a lifelong commitment to a temporary inconvenience with benefits upon divorce. Crimes against children must not be tolerated or supported.But I must also say that step-fathers also interfere as well. Having to deal with another man being around yourgirlfriend/wife causes tension in many relationships especially when one or both cannot get along. Step parents usingcorporal punishing on step-children has been reported to have higher abuse than biological parent punishment.So why are women more likely to kidnap the children. Here are some of the reasons that fathers have had such a bias anddiscrimination place against them?•Fathers work one or more jobs while women typically stay at home.•Fathers are used to correct/punish (the bad cop) while mothers keep their nurturing side (good cop).•Many Father don’t want the responsibility of being the parent (seeing it as a woman’s place).•Pregnancy, birth and breast feeding create a bond between women and children.•Men keep their distance and don’t easily show their emotions like women.•Children and divorce equals money to a woman so they will fight for every penny.•Because of the bias and discrimination against Fathers men see courts and attorneys as a threat and a financialblood letting. The more the Father fights the more it will cost.•Attorneys don’t want cases against mothers because don’t work and cannot pay the attorney fees and court costslike a man could.•False allegations are an easy win when a women turns on the tears. District attorneys rarely hesitate to take a caseagainst an abusive Father but once they find out the allegations were false they leave the Father even morevictimized and are not willing to go after the mother. Courts and law enforcement are funded by our government topursue specific crimes.•The entire justice system is 99% AGAINST Fathers (a losing hand)You want to talk statistics? In my case along you have (1) Father, (2) mothers and (4) children. 100% of the mothersviolate our rights to visitation and communications, leaving the children and Father victims to their ‘get out of jail FREE’pattern of contempt which is ignored, promoted and defended by the courts and law enforcement. But let me give evenmore statistical analysis. Two step-fathers interfered (because the mothers interfered), 1 out of 6 judges was trustworthy,unbiased and did not discriminate, 2 out of 10 law enforcement officers made no errors in their reports or testimony, 1 out of5 attorneys fought an honest and honorable fight. How many children assume that their Fathers are who their mothers told them they really were. In roughly 10 years I havespoken to many children who assumed that their Fathers were the ‘dead beat Dad’s’ that their mothers programmed themto believe only to find out later that their mothers had lied about much of the what they were told about their biologicalFathers.50/50 CUSTODY50/50 custody means that the children matter. It also means that while the child(ren) are in your care and custody that youpay and while the child(ren) are in my care and custody I pay. We still share the medical, dental, and education expenses. This eliminates child support helping keep Fathers in the family and out of jail, while increasing Father activity with theirchildren.PARENTAL RELOCATIONTennessee Civil Code 36-6-108 reads ‘If a parent who is spending intervals of time with a child desires to relocate outsidethe state or more than one hundred (100) miles from the other parent within the state, the relocating parent shall send anotice to the other parent at the other parent's last known address by registered or certified mail. Unless excused by thecourt for exigent circumstances, the notice shall be mailed not later than sixty (60) days prior to the move. The notice shallcontain the following: (1) Statement of intent to move; (2) Location of proposed new residence; (3) Reasons for proposed relocation; and (4) Statement that the other parent may file a petition in opposition to the move within thirty (30) days ofreceipt of the notice.But one thing is still missing and this is being REQUIRED to file the existing visitation, custody and support orders with thenew (local) courts so that they may be in effect and enforceable. My X arrived in California in Nov of 2011 and still has notregistered the court orders and the local law enforcement (2,500 miles away) says that someone has to file them with thecourt in that state for them to be able to be enforced. It should be in this civil code that the relocating parent must also filesaid orders with the local law enforcement/court within 24 hours of arriving in that state or it is an act of InterstateInterference which will be pursued by both states not the non-custodial/non-relocating parent. To fail to do any of theseitems is an act of kidnapping and nothing less. Attorney, Judges, and relocating parents compound the issue of parentalkidnapping if they do not perform their duties and responsibilities which are clearly laid out in black and white. When thedispatcher for the Folsom, California police department said I had no right to see my son because I didn’t have a Californiacourt order was an act of interference by a law enforcement agency because it is their job to know the law.FORCED FATHERSThe following was taken from the US Department of Health and Human Services website:States' Definitions of 'Father'There is no standard definition for the word 'father' in statutes across the States. Approximately five States, theDistrict of Columbia, American Samoa, and the U.S. Virgin Islands provide no definitions for the term at all.2However, most States have definitions for the various categories of unmarried fathers. The term 'putative father' isdefined in statute in 12 States.3 With some variation in language, the term 'putative father' generally means a manwhose legal relationship to a child has not been established but who is alleged to be or claims that he may be thebiological father of a child who is born to a woman to whom he is not married at the time of the child's birth.In approximately 22 States and the Northern Mariana Islands, a man may be presumed to be the father of a child inany of the following circumstances:oHe and the child's mother are or were married to each other, and the child is born during themarriage or within 300 days after the marriage ended.oBefore the birth of the child, he and the child's mother attempted to marry, and the marriage is orcould be declared invalid, and the child is born during the marriage or within 300 days after themarriage is terminated.oWith his consent, he is listed as the father on the child's birth certificate.oHe has acknowledged his paternity in writing.oHe is obligated to support the child, either by voluntary agreement or court order. The Court of theHonorable Jerry SpringeroWhile the child is a minor, he has resided with the child and openly claimed the child as hisbiological child. Wouldn’t this be hearsay unless he admitted to saying it? Access to InformationAccess to information maintained in registries also varies from State to State. Many jurisdictions permit certainpersons access to registry records. In general, these are people with a direct interest in a case. Typically, personsentitled to access include birth mothers, courts, attorneys, licensed adoption agencies, prospective adoptive parents,State departments of social services, State offices of child support enforcement, registries of States, or any otherperson upon a court order for good cause. I do not see anything about the father in this paragraph. Why isthe father not included as having the right to access the information about children that are ‘defined’ ashis?http://www.childwelfare.gov/systemwide/laws_policies/statutes/putative.cfmCHILDRENBut let’s also take a look at the third factor in the family equation...The Children. When they are infants they scream, cryand poop. When they are toddlers they are into everything. But when they become teens they can be the root of evil in afamily too. Sex, drugs and rock and roll is what your grandparents always warn youngsters about but is that because theyknow those things can cause harm from their bible studies or because they too destroyed lives when they were teenagers. When teenage girls act out it is usually just a tantrum and a slur of “I Hate You” statements. But teenage girls are at a pointin their lives where sex, drugs and bad choices are at the highest level and in a large number of cases Fathers are sayingbe good and don’t do that while mothers are saying “don’t listen to him do what ever you want.” “Girls just want to havefun” is a loaded statement that mothers make to daughters which has much the same consequences as “it’s our littlesecret” does from fathers. If a Father says “No” the typical response is “mom said I could.” When the daughter gets introuble it is “Daddy save me.” But during the drama trauma of teenage girls tempting sex with older men, dressinginappropriately, bad boyfriends and even trying drugs usually leads to teen pregnancies and men over the age of 18 goingto jail. Children steal from their parents, take medications, and tell the parents what to do.Teenage boys are simple. Give them a yard to mow, a motor to work on and a pool to swim in and they will, for the mostpart, stay out of trouble. When teenage boys in troubles it is typically a braking traction offense as they are spinning theirtires, getting into a fight with other boys and getting a girl pregnant. But since neither the mother nor the Father has “thetalk” with the son he goes along in life unaware that things are about to take a wild turn. When we had our sex educationclass in school all of us “boys” sat at the lunchroom table trying to figure out which finger the condom went on. That wassome quality education there. Boys don’t have to worry about dropping out of high school if they get pregnant but if taughtcorrectly they will not be getting girls pregnant and you can reduce the number of boys who abuse girls (which will in turnreduce the number of men who abuse women). Education is a highly useful tool if it is not controlled, limited ormanipulated.G-string and thongs are nothing only being promoted by the mothers as sexy and a must have to get the “right man” (likethey know) but is also being promoted by the industry itself. Schools and Planned Parenthood are also promoting teen sexand even provide contraception free of charge. Young girls (12-15 average), like their mothers, get the “get out of jailFREE” card too when they choose online names and trolling the chat sites for men who will talk dirty to them or even meetthem for sex. Their mothers are the ones telling them that older men are stable and know what they are doing whileFathers are holding a baseball bat and saying back off. In most households the mother gives the daughters “the talk” aboutthe birds and the bees but who monitors, limits or controls what they say? It’s all just a game until they get caught and thenthey play the rape card and turn up the victim drama while the man who was lured in was just another fish in the net goes tojail. Funny how for a man to be arrested for hiring a prostitute he has to say “how much” or something to that affect butwhen a girl online (who he has no idea how old she is) is going after him it was his fault. How many times have you evercarded your date? How many ways do you have to check if the ID is fake? How many clubs catch teenage girls with fakeIDs? But it’s only the guys who are doing anything wrong.SEX, DRUGS & ROCK-&-ROLLI did a research project into the pornography industry which caused me to take a stand and write the President of theUnited States. There was not only clear and convincing evidence that the porn industry was targeting 8 year old childrenbut that the White House was in on it. www.WhiteHouse.com used to be a porn site until my letter got them shut down. Inmy letter I explored what any child who came home with a homework assignment from school or just while trying to raisetheir intelligence would experience on the internet. If the child chose just about any subject graphic sex was going to popup in their face. But my project wasn’t just to see how perverted (polluted) the data had become but also to try to put a stopto “accidental exposer” of children. If an adult exposes a child to pornography then their are crimes and punishments...buta porn peddler has no such liabilities or consequences. So I drafted a plan to remove ANYTHING pornographic from theWWW net. “WWW” is what you typically type before a internet address like www.WALMART.com. In the document (which I sent to our President at the time) I also drafted the outline for not only removing it from the WWW but also a plan for placingit on the XXX net. In the plan EVERYONE who accessed the XXX net would have to provide minimum proof of age andother materials, which is only a lock to keep honest people honest, but is more than is currently in place. Today an innocent child on the internet is 100% likely to find adult materials. My approach was that 0% of children could find adult material onthe internet without either the aid of an adult or a violation of a law. The response from the White House was basically wedon’t understand what you are saying and forwarded my letter to Home Land Security (I guess they are running the onlineporn industry...lol). But www.WhiteHouse.com is no longer a porn site. What most women don’t see is that without womenthe internet would not even make the media. Statistics prove that there are 1,000,000:1 women to men in the internetimages and videos. No, I don’t support, promote nor condone pornography. But when it affects children likewww.WhiteHouse.com did I am going to do my part to help stop it.I also got another internet site taken down when I went looking for Nickelodeon which I misspelled. The local news come tomy house and I documented for them how I, not knowing how to spell the children’s TV channel found a site that waspeddling smoking and drug paraphernalia and had the appearance of a children’s site. I swear that if you want to catcheven more pedophiles then create the website incest.com and have them sign up, post their personal info, and photos andthen take them down too. I also suspect that if you put a naughty teen babysitter site you would not only catch men, butmothers and teenage daughter in the same numbers who are peddling sex for money (but they wouldn’t be chargedbecause only men are criminals). If it weren’t for woman porn on the intenet would only be homosexual. So make sure youcheck your “it’s only a guy thing” at the door when you are posting your own photos and videos ladies.GOVERNMENTBut let’s also take a look into the government and the agencies for which it has designed to not only kidnap children butpromote the selling of the children they claim to protect. CPS / DFCS is very well known for being above the law,kidnapping children without just cause and then selling them to people who are willing to pay for them. Recently thenational media has put out a cry to stop sex slave and child trafficking which I find ironic because it sends our militarytroops into countries were daughters are sold for sex every day like the Philippines. They never did anything to stop sexslaves or trafficking of women in those countries why would they care about stopping it here? The government could put astop or protect children from pornography but they don’t because far too many parents would complain that their freedomshave been violated or they have too much power. So where do you draw the line? They are not welcome in the bedrooms but we want them to fix our problems. We want them to protect and defend us butnot violate or abuse us. How can you separate the two halves and still make the people happy? Recently Missouri passed a law that make it a felony to parentally abduct a child for more than a specific period of time. Ifmore than 6 months the parent could be jailed for as long as 15 years. I saw just take away their rights as a parent, givethem 30 days and ten years of community service. Make the time fit the crime. No judge is going to sentence a woman tojail for 15 years for not letting her child see the Father. Taking a man’s drivers license will not make him pay child supportany more than throwing him in jail will. Besides child support, alimony and family court attorneys are just creating HostageChildren and backing the Babies 4 Bank schemes of women which hurt children. Removing the Father from the familiesis as cruel as keeping food from an animal.4 CHILDREN, 2 MOTHERS & 1 FATHER
FAMILY PAGEGod is the one friend who will not turn away from you in your time of suffering and need. Click on the Bible and one will be delivered to you.Click on the pen above to contact meNote that the information contained in these sites is not legal advice, I am not an attorney, the information may not be accurate or current and is subject to each individual interpretation. You agree to hold me harmless and have been informed of such.Specific cases are where there may be just cause this information does not apply and is not held to judicial standards because it is the person opinion, experience and information was collected from personal, private and public sources which I have no control over.Site Founded June 25, 2007 - All Rights Reserved.WheresDADDY.ORG, WheresMOMMY.ORG & AChildsRights.ORG